ERASER HEIDI VS CCLEANER REVIEW PC

It also became heavier over time as I used the File Explorer extension to erase particular files/folders with a huge task list. In the negative, it was fairly heavy in memory use. If you consult its forum section, you can also set it to wipe data in the Internet cache, temporary files, Internet cookies, and other custom locations, but CCleaner is easier to use for such cleaning. The default method used for erasing files is set to “Gutmann (35 passes)”. It adds an item to the context menu so that you can securely erase files with a right-click. It is your choice if you want to integrate Eraser with your Windows File Explorer. And it produced informative reports for files it could not erase, such as those in use.

ERASER HEIDI VS CCLEANER REVIEW PC

After it erased the free space with a single pass of random data wiping (“Pseudorandom Data”, the default drive erasure method), PC Inspector File Recovery only found 0 bit nonsense file names (none of which were recoverable). It was very effective in my testing on a medium size hard drive. It works with any drive (including IDE, SCSI, and RAID), and with FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS partitions. And the forum seems quite responsive to questions and problems. It comes with a very detailed built-in help file. free space), cluster tips (aka slack space), and the recycling bin.Įraser can overwrite the data area with your choice of a variety of random data patterns. Heavy on system resources, starts slower than FileShredder, the scheduler is of minimal usefulness for resource conscious users.Įraser allows you to easily add tasks to securely erase selected files and folders, unused disk space (aka.

Gives informative reports, noting any unerased files/cluster tips. Excellent for scheduling, rich features, and has good help and forum support. Works with files and any drive, including IDE, SCSI and RAID, and CD-RWs.

Eraser heidi vs ccleaner review